#7 Wrong phrasing for GDFL-NIV license

Closed
opened 1 year ago by moht · 1 comments
moht commented 1 year ago

According to Debian the license header in info/gfsecret.texi (and therefore info/gfsecret.info) is not correct. There's two with in surplus.

any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no
- Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover
+ Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover
Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled ``GNU
According to [Debian](https://lintian.debian.org/tags/license-problem-gfdl-non-official-text.html) the license header in `info/gfsecret.texi` (and therefore `info/gfsecret.info`) is not correct. There's two `with` in surplus. ```diff any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no - Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover + Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled ``GNU ```
damien closed this issue 1 year ago
moht commented 1 year ago
Poster

Totally pedantic (this is even the name of the category of this lintian tag)

Totally pedantic (this is even the name of the category of this lintian tag)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

This issue currently doesn't have any dependencies.

Loading…
There is no content yet.